EVERYDAYNESS, DIGITALIZATION AND CREATIVITY IN THE EDUCATIONAL SPACE: AN ONTO-ANTHROPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Keywords:
everydayness, digitalization, creativity, learning environment, onto-anthropology, digital practices, student autonomy, integrated environment, humanistic values, educational technologiesAbstract
The article explores the interaction of everyday practices, digitalization, and creativity in the contemporary learning environment from an onto-anthropological perspective. It emphasizes that digital technologies serve not only as tools for learning but also as factors shaping students’ modes of being, cognitive and social practices, and creative self-expression. The study examines how physical, digital, and social environments integrate into the everyday practices of participants in the educational process, creating conditions for the development of autonomy, critical thinking, creative competencies, and adaptability in the context of constant change. Key dimensions of the learning environment are identified: physical, digital, and everyday practices, as well as the integrative effect of their combination, which forms a space conducive to the comprehensive development of personality. The analysis demonstrates that creativity in the digital environment acquires ontological significance: it shapes the student’s way of existence, enabling the construction of personal educational experiences, the creation of new meanings, and active engagement with informational flows and sociocultural resources. The article also highlights the role of the educator as a mentor and facilitator, guiding the learning process by balancing technological possibilities with humanistic values, while fostering autonomy and critical thinking. The research underscores that effective digital education requires harmonizing technological progress with personal development, integrating reflective practices, collaborative creativity, and social interaction. Findings show that combining physical, digital, and everyday practices promotes the formation of a holistic educational trajectory, the realization of students’ potential, and the development of their capacity for self-expression and co-creation of knowledge. The conclusions may serve as a methodological foundation for designing learning environments that stimulate the growth of autonomous, creative, and socially responsible individuals capable of active participation in contemporary information and digital contexts.
References
Базелюк, О. (2021). Основні тенденції та виклики цифровізації у вищій освіті. Педагогічний дискурс, (31), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.31475/ped.dys.2021.31.05
Доценко, С. (2025). Роль цифрових технологій у формуванні технічної творчості здобувачів професійної освіти. Молодь і ринок. № 9 (241), 23–27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4634.2025.338029
Коляда, І. Г., & Великодна, Є. М. (2022). Особливості сприйняття дійсності в межах цифрового простору. Культурологічний альманах, (3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2022.3.17.
Bobrytska, V. I., Krasylnykova, H. V., Protska, S. M., Skyrda, T. S., Krasylnykov, S. R., & Chkhalo, O. M. (2023). Digitalisation in higher education: A systematic review of its impact on health, cognition, and social interaction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 37–58. URL: https://ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2320
Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Hans-Georg Gadamer on education, poetry and history: Applied hermeneutics (PDF). SUNY Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy. Topper Learning. URL: https://topperlearning.motion.ac.in/.../applied_hermeneutics_suny.pdf
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Heidegger, M. (1993). Basic writings: From being and time (1927) to the task of thinking (1964) (D. F. Krell, Ed.). HarperSanFrancisco.
Jordanous, A., & Keller, B. (2016). Modeling creativity: Identifying key components through a corpus-based approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33394-7_1
Nyaaba, M. (2024). Transforming teacher education in developing countries: The role of generative AI in bridging theory and practice. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10718?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2024). Generative AI and agency in education: A critical scoping review and thematic analysis. arXiv. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/
Sharples, M. (2023). The impact of digital technologies on student creativity and learning. Cambridge University Press.
Ulmasovna, D. M., Asadova, I. Z., Ravilevna, A. A., & Baxtiyor Kizi, M. T. (2022). Enhancement the creativity of teachers in the context of digital education. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 5970–5982. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.8967
Yan, Z., Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2023). Digital education and creative engagement: A multi-dimensional perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 5–12.







