“CULTURAL DETERMINISM”: EVOLUTION OF THEORY AND DETERMINING FACTORS

Authors

  • Oksana Gosteva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2023.2.32

Keywords:

culture, determinism, cultural determinism, technological determinism, factors of cultural determinism, values, traditions, customs, symbols, archetypes.

Abstract

The article examines the evolution of the theory of cultural determinism and its determining factors. On the basis of theoretical analysis, the concept of determinism is revealed, which, when applied to scientific research, takes the form of a basic, original principle. It is established that the doctrine of cultural determinism has found wide distribution in scientific research, having passed through certain stages. The article examines the evolution of the concept of determinism from ancient times to its modern interpretation. The modern vision of cultural determinism has absorbed all previous teachings, generalizing them. The research emphasizes that it is the philosophical doctrine of determinism that continues to play an important role in cultural studies. «Cultural determinism» is outlined and the main stages of its formation in cultural studies are presented. The interpretation of cultural determinism is characterized by an expansive interpretation of the concept of culture, which means that culture is described as a factor that determines all others. It is noted that the school of cultural anthropology had a significant influence on the formation of cultural determinism in scientific research. The article analyzes the ideas of scientific views about the determining factors of cultural determinism. It has been established that values (including religious ones), traditions, customs, symbols, archetypes are significant factors of cultural determinism. It was concluded that «cultural determinism» means the transformation of new types and methods of human activity (innovations) into social norms and models that ensure their institutionalization, integration and consolidation in the culture of society.

References

Benedict R., (1983) Patterns of Culture : [Benedict, Ruth: . Routledge & Kegan Paul Freud, Sigmund] Tres ensayos sobre teoría sexual. Buenos Aires: Alianza Editorial, Biblioteca Freud; pág. 61.

Freeman D., (1983) The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. Derek Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983. xviii, 380 pp.

Kroeber A., (1917) L. The Superorganic. American Anthropologist. Vol. 19, iss. 2. P. 163–213.

Кононенко С., (2004) Політичний детермінізм (нарис теорії влади). Антологія творчих досягнень. Київ: ІСЕМВ НАН України, 2004. Вип. 1. С. 210–215.

Культурний детермінізм (2006). Режим доступу: http://ni.biz.ua/13/13_12/13_126681_kulturniy-determinizm. html (дата звернення: 10.05.2023).

Лук’янець B.C., (2006) Філософія реконструкції: походження, стратегія, загальнокультурне значення. Філософська думка. № 1.

Malinovski В., (1944). A Scientific Theory of Culture. Chapell Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 944, p. 150.

Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P., (2005). The social separation of old and young: A root of ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 343–360.

Havighurst‚ R.J.‚ & Tobin‚ S.S., (1961). The Measurement of Life Satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology‚ 16‚ 134–143.

Робуль, О., (2006). Синергетика як інноваційна методологія педагогічної освіти. Філософія освіти, 1(3), С. 35–41.

Сохань Л. В., (1982) Стиль жизни личности. Теоретические и методологические проблемы. Киев : Научная мысль, 1982. – 372 с.

Chandler, D., (2002) Technological or Media Determinism. URL: https:// www.wolearn.org/pluginfile.php/45/ mod_page/content/23/chandler2002_PDF_ful.pd. (дата звернення: 17.06.2023).

Skinner, B. F. (1967). In Boring, E. G.; Lindzey, G. (eds.). A History of Psychology in Autobiography. Vol. 5. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. pp. 387–413.

Homans, G. C., (1958). Social behavior as exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63, 597-606.

Ong, W. J., (1982) Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York: Methuen, 1982. 201 p.

Парнюк М.А., (1972) Принцип детерминизма в системе материалистической диалектики. Киев : Наукова думка, 1972. 356 с.

Parsons T., (1962) Youth in the Context of American Societyю. Daedalus. – 1962. Vol. 91. P. 97–123.

Reginald Radcliffe-Brown A., (1940) On Joking Relationships. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, Vol. 13, №. 3 (Jul., 1940), pp. 195–210.

Тимошенко В.І., (2006-2007) Проблема свободи волі: від механістичного детермінізму до нормативного ідеалізму. Проблеми філософії права. Т. IV–V С. 232-235.

Черняк М.П., (2007) Знайомтесь – синергетика. Країна знань, 4-5, 29-33.

Шаталович І.В., (2010) Нові дослідження проблемних аспектів концепції детермінізму на межі ХХ–ХХІ століть. Філософія. Культура. Життя, 34, 215–225.

Weber Max; Hans Heinrich Gerth; Bryan S. Turner (1991) From Max Weber: essays in sociology – Psychology Press, P.1.

White L., (1959) The Evolution of Culture: The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome ., New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., xi, 378 pp.

Published

2023-09-19

How to Cite

Gosteva О. В. (2023). “CULTURAL DETERMINISM”: EVOLUTION OF THEORY AND DETERMINING FACTORS. Культурологічний альманах, (2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2023.2.32

Issue

Section

CULTUROLOGY