IDENTITY SUBSTANTIATION: THEORETICAL AND VALUE DIMENSIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2023.3.19

Keywords:

соціальна ідентичність, моделі ідентичності, цінності, соціокультурні моделі ідентичності

Abstract

The article offers the author's analysis of the concept of identity. Attention is focused on the role of identity in the constitution of a person and community. Its role in the formation of social meanings of pre-modern and modern times, ensuring individual and collective development is substantiated. The evolution of identity is traced from the theoretical justifications of the past to the understanding of modern problems related to the functioning of the individual and the community within the existing social order. Updated social criticism of the concept of identity and its conceptualization in the process of social transformations of the 20–21 centuries. It is noted that the affirmation of identity as a basic concept of social and individual self-determination became possible on the basis of powerful socio-philosophical and theoretical prerequisites. The analysis centers around the theoretical connection of identity with dimensions of social emancipation, the concept of trust, social capital, cultural and moral factors of community and human development. The problematic issues of identity in the modern world are outlined. The social logic of the development of this social institution is subject to analysis, which at the present stage leads to the aggravation of conflicts between value-opposed communities: 1) aimed at dimensions of social freedom and social autonomy; 2) oriented at imperial and dynastic interests. An important place is given to clarifying the value dimensions of identity, which are an important constant in the modern evolution of Ukraine as a part of the European community. The constructivist and historical principles of identity are substantiated. Functional and moral-normative dimensions of identity models are noted. Emphasis is placed on the need to combine rational and historical-symbolic dimensions of identity as a necessary social basis for changes in post-colonial and post-communist countries. The research confirms that complex social changes are possible only through the conscious use of the identity factor as a driver of social activity by representatives of the social elite and broad social groups. It is noted that through common rational behavior and powerful mechanisms of its support within the limits of social imagination, a model of effective social development can be formed, in which conditions are created for the functioning of European identity models.

References

Anderson, B. (1983). Imaginad Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London.

Barnard, F. M. (ed.) (2010). J. G. Herder on Social & Political Culture (Cambridge Studies in the History andTheory of Politics), Cambridge University Press.

Bauman, Z. (2011). Ponowoczesne wzory osobowe. Studia Sicjologiczne, 1, 435–438 https://www.studiasocjologiczne.pl/img_upl/studia_socjologiczne_2011_nr1_s.435_458.pdf .

Bokszański, Z. (1999). Tozsamość narodowa w pespectywie transformacji systemowej, w: J. Mucha (ed.) Społeczeństwo polskie w perspetywie członlowstwa w Unii Europejskiej, IfiS PAN, Warszawa.

Brubaker, R. (2010). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge.

Ericson, E. (1968). Identity and Identity diffusion, w: Ch. Gordon (ed), K.L. Gtrge (ed) The Sekf in Social interaction. New York.

Fichte, J.-G. (2015). Reden an die deutsche Nation. Produced by Norbert H. Langkau, G. Decknatel and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/48340

Kollár, J. (1929). Rozpravy o slovanské vzájemnosti. Souborné vydání / uspoř. M. Weingart. Praha : Nákladem Slovanského ústavu. Sv. 1. 244 s.

Misztal, B. (2000). Globalizacja ryzyko i tożsamość. Przyklad tworzenia pojęć teoretycznych w sociologii. In: Teoria socjologiczna a practica społeczna. Kraków. Universitas.

Sen, Amartia (2017). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny (Issues of Our Time). Abridged, W. W. Norton & Company; Abridged edition.

Smith, A. (1979). The Etnic orifions of Nations. Oxford.

Smith, A. (1987). Nationalism in the Twentieth Century. New York.

Szporluk, R. (1981). The Political thought of Thomas G. Masaryk. East European Monographs, Coulumbia University Press.

Taylor, Ch. (2006). Participatory Self-Rule. Polity Press.

Бистрицький, Є. (2015). Поняття ідентичності. Ідентичність і спільнота. Національна ідентичність і громадянське суспільство. Київ. «Дух і Літера».

Єрмоленко, В. (2017). Руссо або страх близькості. Далекі близькі. Есеї з філософії та літератури. Львів. Видавництво Старого Лева. С. 13–32.

Забужко, О.С. (1993). Філософія української ідеї та європейський контекст. Київ, Основи.

Костомаров, М. (б.р.). Дві руські народности. Ляйпціґ. «Українська Накладня». https://diasporiana.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/books/13655/file.pdf

Рябчук, М. (2019). Долання амбівалентності. Дихотомія української національної ідентичності – історичні причини та політичні наслідки. Київ. ІПіЕНД ім. І.Ф. Кураса НАН України.

Фукуяма, Ф. (1999). Великий крах. Людська природа і відновлення соціального порядку. Львів. Кальварія.

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

Zaitseva І. С. (2023). IDENTITY SUBSTANTIATION: THEORETICAL AND VALUE DIMENSIONS. Культурологічний альманах, (3), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2023.3.19