HISTORICAL EDUCATIONAL TRADITIONS AND THEIR PLACE IN MODERN CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2024.2.32Keywords:
civic competence, education, development strategies, critical thinking, digitalization.Abstract
The work examines the strategies for the development of civil society, the definition of the role of education and critical thinking in the formation of a modern citizen. In the article, an attempt was made on the basis of system and content analysis to consider the strengths and weaknesses of state policy strategies regarding the formation of civil society and civic education, taking into account modern conditions of martial law, active digitalization of the educational process, etc. Based on the consideration of individual legislative initiatives, it was established that the formation of civil society development strategies in Ukraine began at the beginning of the 21st century, when such documents were already functioning in other countries of the Central European region. State institutions gradually became aware of the role of civil society, although the lack of mandatory indicators of civil society development demonstrated the weakness of such projects. If the first documents are more like declarations that reveal certain markers for development, then the gradual transition to concrete formulations, the implementation of real initiatives made it possible to develop civic education through the combination of various elements of tradition and innovation. Taking into account the emphasis on the need to develop critical thinking, media literacy, existing regulatory documents determine the real modern features of the formation of civic competence among students of education. The article separately emphasizes that there is a need to supplement existing documents with the use of new relevant tools that offer mechanisms of digitization and distance learning in education. The conclusions emphasized that with the use of new modern digital tools, even in today’s extreme conditions, it would be possible to continue to develop civic competence in the environment of education seekers, resorting not only to highlighting the peculiarities of the educational process, but also to current trends in self-education, lifelong education and other important factors acquisition of theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the modern world.
References
Андрійчук, Т. (2020). Державна підтримка розвитку громадянського суспільства в Україні у 2007–2020 роках: стратегічні завдання та механізми реалізації. Вісник національного технічного університету України «Київський політехнічний інститут», 4 (48), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2020.4 (48).232688.
Бобро, Н. (2024). Сталий економічний розвиток в умовах цифрової трансформації. Агросвіт, 1, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2024.1.56.
Бондарчук-Ладна, О. (2023). Громадянське суспільство: наукові підходи до визначення. Наукові інновації та передові технології, 12 (26). https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2023-12 (26)-216-226.
Про Національну стратегію сприяння розвитку громадянського суспільства в Україні на 2021–2026 роки: Указ Президента України № 487 від 27.09.2021. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/487/2021#Text.
Про схвалення Концепції розвитку громадянської освіти в Україні: Розпорядження Кабінету Міністрів України № 710-р від 08.10.2022. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/710-2018-р#Text.
Про схвалення Концепції сприяння органами виконавчої влади розвитку громадянського суспільства: Розпорядження Кабінету Міністрів України № 1035-р від 20.06.2012. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1035-2007-р#Text.
Bobro, N. (2024). Key factors and structures of the development of the digital transformation of the economy. Věda a perspektivy, 1 (32), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.52058/2695-1592-2024-1 (32)-9-14.
Johnson, R. H., & Hamby, B. (2015). A Meta-Level Approach to the Problem of Defining ’Critical Thinking’. Argumentation, 29 (4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9356-4.
Kuzheliev, M., Zherlitsyn, D., Nechyporenko, A., Lutkovska, S., & Mazur, H. (2023). Distance learning as a tool for enhancing university academic management processes during the war. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21 (2), 23–30. URL: https://www.businessperspectives.org/index.php/journals/problems-and-perspectives-in-management/
issue-2-spec-issue-3/distance-learning-as-a-tool-for-enhancing-university-academic-management-processes-during-
the-war.
Mulalić, A. (2022). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education: Some Reflections. Academic Perspective Procedia, 5 (1), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.33793/acperpro.05.01.17.
Parshyn, I., & Mereniuk, K. (2023). The Chivalric Traditions and Their Receptions in Galician-Volynian State (13th – 14th centuries). Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 12 (3), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v12i3.3240.
Pettersson, H. (2019). The Conflicting Ideals of Democracy and Critical Thinking in Citizenship Education. Philosophy of Education, 75, 355–368. https://doi.org/10.47925/75.2019.355.
Vergara Garavito, J., & Rodríguez, M. S. (2020). Critical thinking and its importance in doctoral education. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 16 (2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v16n2a15.