THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AS A SUBJECT OF SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2025.2.41

Keywords:

sustainable development, social philosophy, anthropocentrism, environmental ethics, economic sustainability, social justice

Abstract

The article provides a socio-philosophical analysis of the concept of sustainable development as one of the key ideas of the modern global discourse, which defines new worldview guidelines in the interaction of humanity with the natural, social and technological environment. The thesis is substantiated that the concept of sustainable development is not only a set of economic or environmental strategies, but a holistic philosophical paradigm that has ontological, anthropological, ethical, and axiological dimensions. The trinity of sustainable development is analyzed – ecological, economic and social components – as interrelated and interdependent aspects of modern life, requiring a systemic approach to determining future development directions. Special attention is paid to the problems of harmonizing these dimensions. The focus of the study is on philosophical approaches to the interaction of human and nature, including criticism of anthropocentrism and consideration of ecocentric and biocentric concepts. The role of modern technologies in the formation of both potentials and threats to achieving the goals of sustainable development is determined. The contribution of philosophical concepts, in particular, ecological ethics (earth ethics, biocentric egalitarianism) to the formation of a new ethical paradigm of interaction with the environment is analyzed. Criticism of the concept of sustainable development is considered, in particular, from the side of post- structuralism, economic realism and supporters of the concept of “strong” sustainability. The article also draws attention to alternative economic models – circular economy, degrowth – which offer new scenarios for the transition to sustainable development. As a result, the need to integrate philosophical approaches to sustainable development into global and local policies is substantiated in order to form a harmonious, just and viable future.

References

Brennan, A., & Lo, Y.-S. (2021, December 3). Environmental ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. April 18, 2025. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/.

Emas, R. (2015). The concept of sustainable development: Definition and defining principles (Brief for GSDR 2015). United Nations. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5839GSDR%202015_SD_concept_definiton_rev.pdf.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

Holmberg, T. J. (2025). Sustainability ethics and environmental justice. Biology LibreTexts. April 18, 2025. URL: https://bio.libretexts.org/Sandboxes/tholmberg_at_nwcc.edu/Introduction_to_Environmental_Science/15%3A_Our_Environmental_Future/5.4.2%3A_Sustainability_Ethics_and_Environmental_Justice.

Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.

Комнатний, С. (2021). Філософія сталого розвитку як дороговказ для формування сучасної державної житлової політики. Філософські та методологічні проблеми права, 21 (1), 60. https://doi.org/10.33270/02212101.60.

Кивлюк, О., Гарбар, Г., Пунченко, О., Арабаджиєв, Д., & Андрюкайтене, Р. (2024). Філософія сталого розвитку в умовах цифрової трансформації як основа збалансованого економічного зростання, соціального добробуту та екологічної стійкості. Humanities Studies, 21 (98). https://doi.org/10.32782/hst-2024-21-98-06.

Kulik, R. M. (2025, March). Sustainable development. Encyclopædia Britannica. URL: https://www.britannica.com/topic/sustainable-development.

Lele, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19 (6), 607–621. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0305750X9190197P.

Loo, C., & Stoeckl, S. (2020). Equity is great, but what does it have to do with sustainability? In No sustainability without justice: An anthology on racial equity and social justice (Vol. I, Essay 2). Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE). URL: https://www.aashe.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/RESJ-2020-Anthology-Essay-2.pdf.

Masterson, V. (2022, June 15). Degrowth: What's behind this economic theory and why it matters today. World Economic Forum. April 18, 2025. URL: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/06/what-is-degrowth-economics-climate-change/.

Molotokienė, E. (2022). A philosophical analysis of the concept of sustainable development. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 31 (2), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.15181/rfds.v31i2.2106.

Поліщук, О., & Петрук, Н. (2022). Аксіологічні орієнтири у філософії сталого розвитку суспільства. Вісник НЮУ імені Ярослава Мудрого. Серія: Філософія, філософія права, політологія, соціологія, 1 (52). https://doi.org/10.21564/2663-5704.52.250656.

Поліщук, В. І. (2024). Еволюція концепції сталого розвитку: соціально-філософські аспекти. Освітній дискурс: Збірник наукових праць, 51 (10–12).

Sachs, W. (2010). Environment. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (pp. 24–37). London, New York: Zed Books.

Smith, M. (2015). Deep ecology: What is said and (to be) done? The Trumpeter, 30 (2), 141–156. URL: https://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/1378.

Stoddart, H. (2011). A pocket guide to sustainable development governance. Stakeholder Forum.

Tulloch, L., & Neilson, D. (2014). The neoliberalisation of sustainability. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 13 (1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.2304/csee.2014.13.1.26.

United Nations General Assembly. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Oslo, Norway: United Nations General Assembly, Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. United Nations. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.

Yong, A. (2023, March 19). Technology, sustainability and society: Where they intersect. Unsustainable Magazine. April 18, 2025. URL: https://www.unsustainablemagazine.com/sustainability-and-society/.

Published

2025-05-29

How to Cite

Yaremenko І. К. (2025). THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AS A SUBJECT OF SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS. Культурологічний альманах, (2), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2025.2.41