THE THEORY OF RITUAL SACRIFICE: PAST AND PRESENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2023.4.14Keywords:
ritual, sacrifice, sacralization, satisfaction, mythAbstract
Traditional theories of ritual sacrifice have focused their interpretive efforts on cultural, religious, and economic explanations. They argued that sacrifices gained approval because they served a practical role in affirming sacralization or exchange. Humans utilized sacrifices to establish connections between the profane and the sacred through exchange. Modern research proposes a more multidimensional view of ritual sacrifice. It directs attention to both religious and socio-psychological motivations for ritual sacrifice. This article presents a multi-aspect approach to ritual sacrifice, emphasizing that, in addition to satisfying cultural and economic needs, there were also biological and socio-psychological needs motivating the practice of ritual sacrifice. The practice of ritual sacrifice provided psychological satisfaction and alleviated the challenges of death and other uncertainties that arise in human life. A wide range of elements in the ritual of sacrifice, such as singing, dancing, feasting, experiencing acts of danger and violence, provided a biopsychosocial motivation for the ritual. The paper argues that these elements, containing psychological states of joy and fear, satisfied deep biological and psychological needs of humans.
References
Fagan, G. G. (2011). The Lure of the Arena: Social Psychology and the Crowd at the Roman Games. Cambridge University Press.
Ingham, G. K. (1984). Capitalism Divided? The City and Industry in British Social Development. Macmillan Education UK.
Paladino, M. P., Mazzurega, M., Pavani, F., & Schubert, T. W. (2010). Synchronous Multisensory Stimulation Blurs Self-Other Boundaries. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1202–1207.
Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity (Vol. 110). Cambridge University Press.
Reilly Kent, F. (2012). Mesoamerican Religious Beliefs: The Practices and Practitioners. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In The Oxford Handbook of Mesoamerican Archaeology, ed. Deborah L. Nichols and Christopher A. Pool, 764–775.