CHARLES TAZE RUSSELL’S ASSESSMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC MODELS IN THE CONTEXT OF OVERCOMING CIVILIZATION PROBLEMS

Abstract

This article delves into the analysis of socio-economic models implemented by Charles Taze Russell to address civilizational challenges. His assessment is intriguing due to the application of a unique approach rooted in his religious mindset. The distinctiveness of his analysis lies in the integration of earthly (current social models), heavenly (the reality of heaven), and the heavenly on earth (the idea of the Millennial Kingdom). Russell evaluates communism, socialism, anarchism, and the social challenge within the framework of implementing the dry law and the concept of the Millennial Kingdom. He contends that the latter could effectively address existing civilizational problems. In examining the communist model, Russell attempts to demonstrate that it was partially implemented by the First Apostolic Church but failed due to imperfect people. He suggests that God allowed certain features of communism in the early Christian community to illustrate the impracticality of such a method for organizing and developing the community as a whole. According to Russell, socialism and collectivism do not advocate joint ownership of real estate, preserving elements of private ownership. Regarding anarchism, his evaluation of this model lacks positive aspects. While the introduction of a dry law would benefit society, it poses various challenges requiring time and resources for resolution. In conclusion, Russell asserts that the only hope for humanity and the solution to civilizational problems lie in the imminent arrival of the millennial kingdom of Jesus Christ. He views this “Godpromised means” as humanity’s salvation, predicting its establishment on earth in the near future. Russell maintains that the kingdom will not be governed by the presidency or the choice of the majority but by the sovereignty and authority of God.