ORIGINS AND CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECTIVE PHOTOGRAPHY IN THE USSR IN THE LATE 20TH CENTURY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2024.2.49

Keywords:

author’s subjectivity, subjective photography, Otto Steinert, Sartre, Camus, humanism, existentialism, Interpress-photo 66, Lithuanian photography, Kharkiv photography, the Immediate Photography group, Oleksandr Slyusarev, Boris Mikhailov.

Abstract

The article examines the cultural, historical and philosophical prerequisites for the emergence of subjective photography in the Soviet Union in the middle and late 20th century. A subjective view of photography among photographers and photo amateurs in the USSR was formed by avant-garde currents in world and Soviet culture in the middle of the 20th century. The concepts of subjectivity and the author’s subjectivity are considered in the spirit of the ideas of French existentialists about humanism and existentialism, etc. The Being, essence, and being of a person are the subjects of research not only of existential philosophers. Photographers are also able to capture their subjective experience and the experiences of others in their immediacy and acuteness. Along with their foreign colleagues, Soviet photographers in the late 20th century turned to the study of the conditions of human existence, human essence, etc. In the post-war period, the author’s subjectivity of Soviet photographers manifested itself to the greatest extent in the networks of creative groups (self-organizations), created against the background of numerous art studios, photography clubs, etc., which were part of the system of state amateur clubs. Independent creative groups that were created in the 1970s–1980s, had chosen photography as a medium for the creation of photo-based Art. The Another (the other people) turns out to be a condition for the existence of the author’s subjectivity in photography. During the study, conceptual and descriptive-phenomenological methods were used, as well as comparative studies and hermeneutics. A historical and cultural analysis of little-known sources regarding the development of subjective photography was carried out.

References

Вишеславський, Г. А. (2020). Contemporary art України – від андеграунду до мейнстріму. Київ: ІПСМ НАМУ. 256 с.

Горбань, А. В. (2006). Авторская субъективность как структурная модель художественного текста. Вісник Житомирського державного університету, 26, 113–116.

Дрофань, Л. (2018). Українське шістдесятництво в іменах. Мистецтвознавство України, 18, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.31500/2309-8155.18.2018.152369

Йосипенко, О. (2020). Суб’єкт і суб’єктивність: В. Декомб vs С. Ложьє. Філософська думка, 6, 42–57. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.06.042

Матвієнко, О. В. (2024). Суб’єкт, суб’єктність та ефективна комунікація. Культурологічний альманах, 1, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2024.1.26

Морозов, С. (1986). Творческая фотография. М.: Планета. 415 с.

Мотрошилова, Н. В. (2012). Отечественная философия 50–80-х годов XX века и западная мысль. М.: Академический Проект. 376 с.

Осадча, О., Павлова Т. В. (2020). KHARKIV PHOTO FORUM 2020: [каталог]. Київ: Букша.

Павлова, Т. В. (2018). Авангард в образотворчому мистецтві Харкова ХХ століття. Doctor Thesis. Львів. 36 с.

Павлова, Т. В. (2007). Фотомистецтво в художній культурі Харкова останньої третини XX століття (на матеріалі пейзажного жанру). PhD Dissertation. Харків. 219 с.

Чех, Н. Б. (2023a). «Гра в мистецтво» Бориса Михайлова (1981–1988): історико-культурний аналіз художнього контексту. Культурологічний альманах, 3, 340–356. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2023.3.47

Чех, Н. (2021). Символічна подорож «Скрипки» Є. Павлова від актуального світу до віртуального та назад. ВІСНИК ХДАДМ, 2, 389–391. https://doi.org/10.33625/visnik2021.02.389.

Чех, Н. (2023b). Феномен гри в художньої творчості Бориса Михайлова: 1966–1980 роки. Науковий журнал ХУДОЖНЯ КУЛЬТУРА. АКТУАЛЬНІ ПРОБЛЕМИ, 19 (1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.19(1).2023.283146

Camus, A. (1958). Discours de Suédois. Retrieved March 14, 2024 from https://athenaphilosophique.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Camus-Albert-Discours-de-suède.pdf

Muchnic, S. (1990, January 3). ART REVIEW: ’The New Subjectivity’ Closes Getty Museum Photography Series. Retrieved March 14, 2024 from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-01-03-ca-66-story.html

Sartre, J.–P. (1970). L’existentialisme est un humanisme. March 14, 2024 https://psychaanalyse.com/pdf/L%20 EXISTENTIALISME%20EST%20UN%20HUMANISME%20-%20JEAN-PAUL%20SARTRE%201970%20(14%20Pages%20-%20106%20Ko).pdf

Published

2024-08-16

How to Cite

Chekh Н. Б. (2024). ORIGINS AND CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECTIVE PHOTOGRAPHY IN THE USSR IN THE LATE 20TH CENTURY. Культурологічний альманах, (2), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2024.2.49

Issue

Section

CULTUROLOGY