LEGITIMATION THROUGH EDUCATION: PHILOSOPHY OF FORMING THE MOTIVATIONAL SPHERE OF FUTURE CITIZENS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2025.3.28Keywords:
legitimation of education, motivation to learn, democratic practices, types of motivation in education, care, AIAbstract
The article examines how education forms a close relationship between motivation and legitimation in people’s behavior. Using the example of democratic legitimation, it is demonstrated that the democratic experience of education instills democratic values in pupils and students that motivate them both to study and to their responsible behavior as citizens in the future. Democratic practices in education are considered as a source of motivation for democratic behavior – as opposed to authoritarian and totalitarian practices. The main characteristics of motivation in education are considered – based on a review of relevant foreign scientific research. The philosophical basis for distinguishing typologies of motivation for behavior in education and typologies of motivation theories is outlined: the emphasis is placed on the priority of practical guidelines over abstract theories of motivation when choosing ways to motivate students to study. The interdependence of teachers’ motivation for teaching and their students’ motivation for studying is revealed. Caring for other participants in the educational process is defined as a motivational factor that not only cannot be replaced by AI, but also helps to better overcome the challenges of implementing AI in education, which can reduce students’ motivation to learn, and teachers’ motivation to teach. The legitimacy of higher education both among the participants in the educational process and in society as a whole should be based on the ability of modern education to successfully adapt to the implementation of AI in education. To do this, modern education should strengthen its engineering and technical components, however, the key tasks for higher education related to adapting to the challenge that AI poses to modern society are still related to the humanitarian component of education.
References
Бойченко, М. (2022). Виправлення іменувань речей: примус війни в освіті і суспільному житті. Філософія освіти, 28 (1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-1-1
Бойченко, М., Бойченко, Н. (2025). Автономія університету: демократія проти тоталітаризму. Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія і практика, 83 (2), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2025.2.3
Дьюї, Дж. (2003а). Демократія і освіта / пер. з англ. І. Босак, М. Олійник, Г. Пехник. Львів : Літопис. 294 с.
Дьюї, Дж. (2003b). Досвід і освіта. Пер. з англ. М. Василечко. Львів : Кальварія. 84 с.
Зінченко, В., Базелюк, Н., Курбатов, С., Бойченко, М., Горбунова, Л., Мєлков, Ю., Шипко, О. (2020). Стратегії вищої освіти в умовах інтернаціоналізації для стійкого розвитку суспільства: монографія. Київ : Інститут вищої освіти НАПН України.
Култаєва, М. (2018). Філософія освіти і виховання Третього рейху: витоки, політико-ідеологічні контексти та концептуальні конструкти. Філософія освіти, 22 (1), 25–87. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2018-22-1-25-87
Мід, Дж. Г. (2000). Дух, самість і суспільство: з точки зору соціального біхевіориста. Пер. з англ. Т. Корпало. Київ : Український центр духовної культури.
Ясперс, К. (2002). Ідея університету /пер. з нім. Ідея університету: антологія. Відп. ред. М. Зубрицька. Львів, Літопис, С. 134–139.
Chuter, C. The role of motivation in learning. The Education Hub. January 20, 2020. URL: https://theeducationhub.org.nz/motivation/
Davidovitch, N., Dorot, R. (2023). The Effect of Motivation for Learning Among High School Students and Undergraduate Students – A Comparative Study. International Education Studies, 16 (2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n2p117
Haugsbakken, H., Brynildsen, S. (2022). A reflective practice perspective on developing professional digital competence among teachers. 15th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, 1168–1176. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.0314.
Heidegger, M. (1983). Die Selbstbehauptung der deutschen Universität. Das Rektorat 1933/34. Hrsg. von Hermann Heidegger. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. 43 с.
Johansen, M. O., Eliassen, S., Jeno, L. M. (2023). “Why is this relevant for me?”: increasing content relevance enhances student motivation and vitality. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1184804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184804.
Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. 661 S.
Misra, D., Stensaker, B. (2024). Balancing control and legitimacy in higher education policy implementation. Studies in Higher Education, 49 (12), 2343–2356. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2306340
Nordmark, M. (2023). Legitimation of digitalisation in education. A case study of vocational student teachers’ lesson plans. Utbildning & Lärande, 17, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.58714/ul.v17i1.12757.
Reash, C., Larwin, K. H. (2021). Factors of Motivation in Education: Perspectives of College Students and Their Professors. Journal of Organizational & Educational Leadership, 7 (1), 2. URL: https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/joel/vol7/iss1/2
Tohidi, H., Jabbari, M. M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 820–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.148
Urhahne, D., Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
Eskja, Vero, Edi, Puka. (2017). The Importance of Motivation in an Educational Environment. Formazione e insegnamento, 15 (1), 57–66. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322532474.pdf
Spark, M. (1961). The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie. Macmillan.







