MYTH AND ITS ROLE IN LOVE

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of myth-making in the context of interpersonal relationships and the formation of the image of the Other. The author views myth not as a distortion of reality, but as a tool for constructing a shared existence, one that can have both life-affirming and destructive potential. The focus is on distinguishing between constructive and destructive myth-making. It is determined that the destructive aspect of myth manifests itself in attempts to manipulate a partner by imposing one’s own fantastical image upon them. In such cases, the myth becomes a tool for objectifying the Other, leading to the emergence of symbiotic dependence and neurotic demands. The author emphasizes that anger and disappointment in relationships are often the result of a real person’s failure to conform to a created mythological canon, which turns the myth into a “prison” for both partners. In contrast, it has been demonstrated that constructive myth-making is perceived as a positive, inspiring force. It is based on a vision of the true essence of the Other, rather than a projection of one’s own expectations. The author concludes that sincerely accepting a loved one in their immediate presence allows the myth to become the “wings” of the relationship – a life-giving force that provides the resources for growth. A constructive myth is described as a flexible, caring, and sensitive process based on faith in the partner’s “divine light,” helping them to manifest their best qualities. The study emphasizes that psychological maturity in a couple manifests itself through the art of balancing the sacralization of the relationship with a healthy sense of humor, and shared mythology with individual autonomy. The constructive nature of myth-making is determined by its dynamic and dialogical nature: it must nourish the emotional bond while remaining a flexible structure that is adjusted under the influence of the real experience of encountering the Other. The article also offers a view of myth as an ethical responsibility to preserve the partner’s freedom within the framework of the created ideal