DESTABILISING BINARY OPPOSITIONS IN ANTHONY DOERR’S “ALL THE LIGHT YOU CANNOT SEE”: SYNERGETIC, THANATOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2026.3.35Keywords:
Anthony Doerr, binary oppositions, synergetics, thanatology, cognitive dimensions, sensory narratology, synesthesia, war narrativeAbstract
This article examines the instability and semantic permeability of fundamental binary oppositions in Anthony Doerr’s “All the Light We Cannot See”. Employing a synergetic approach in conjunction with cognitive poetics, sensory narratology, and thanatological studies, the paper analyses the oppositional structures of light/darkness, childhood/adulthood, individual/collective, and duty/morality. Rather than functioning as fixed conceptual categories, these oppositions emerge as dynamic and mutually interdependent constructs whose boundaries are repeatedly destabilised by the experience of war. Particular attention is devoted to the representation of death and the transformation of the categories of life and future under the conditions of World War II. The article argues that A. Doerr’s narrative constructs a polyphonic thanatological discourse in which death acquires multiple symbolic manifestations conditioned by individual consciousness and cultural memory. The study further demonstrates that sensory experience – especially tactile and olfactory perception – constitutes an essential epistemological principle within the novel and contributes to the formation of a distinctive synesthetic mode of representation. The ambivalent nature of scientific knowledge is likewise explored through the opposition between cognition and destruction. By integrating insights from comparative literature, trauma studies, and cognitive literary criticism, the paper demonstrates that A. Doerr’s novel challenges rigid dichotomous thinking and proposes a more fluid understanding of ethical, existential, and epistemological categories.
References
Alshayea R. M. R. A. M. (2026). Mapping Memory and Perception: The City as a Living Space in All the Light We Cannot See. Literary Cultures. Vol. 9: Conflict and Control within Public Space. Retrieved from: https://journals.ntu.ac.uk/index.php/litc/article/view/535
Anghel, F. (2020). Art puzzling war in Anthony Doerr’s “All the Light We Cannot See”. Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies: BELLS90 Proceedings, 2(2), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.18485/bells90.2020.2.ch21
Areeba, A. (2025). All the war we cannot see: sensory disorientation and phenomenological survival. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393777690_ALL_THE_WAR_WE_CANNOT_SEE_SENSORY_DISORIENTATION_AND_PHENOMENOLOGICAL_SURVIVAL
Damian, M. (2023). The Metaphor of Light – Perspectives on Conceptual Metaphors: Case Study on Anthony Doerr’s All the Light We Cannot See. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica. January, 14(3), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2022-0027
Doerr, E. (2016). All the light we cannot see: a novel; translated from English by O. Gordynchuk. Kharkiv: Book Club “Family Leisure Club”. 352 p.
Goh, I. (2019). Introducing touching literature: Anthony Doerr’s All the Light We Cannot See. CR: The New Centennial Review, 19(3), 241–264.
Mozaffor Hossain, Md. (2023). Cognitive and Linguistic Manifestations of a Blind Child in Anthony Doerra “All the Light We Cannot See”. Lingua Cultura, 17 (1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v17i1.9068
Shvydka, N. (2016). Archetypal-symbolic opposition of light and darkness in biblical discourse. Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University, 769, 71–75.
Veill, A. (2016). “All the Light We Cannot See”, by Anthony Doerr. The Washington Post. May 5. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/all-the-light-wecannot-see-by-anthony-doerr/2014/05/05/c2deec58-cf14-11e3-a6b145c4dffb85a6_story.html





