“ROBINSONS” OF THE DIGITAL WORLD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2023.1.16Keywords:
digital world, social networks, digital person, information and communication isolationAbstract
The digital revolution changing our lives, defines new communication possibilities of the network society. The concept of network communication is a frame model not only of limited one-to-one broadcasting, but also of one-to-many forum communication. Communication in the digital age is simplified by the mass use of likes, avatars, and icons, blurs the boundaries between public and private, and establishes a contradiction between spiritual and meaningful communication and phatic acts of language communication. Some people remain outside these processes, trying to preserve their own identity. The purpose of the article is an attempt to create a social portrait of people who forcibly or consciously refuse to use information and communication technologies excessively, reserving the right to maintain an information and communication distance. It is important that the conceptual definition of “Robinson” used in the publication is a stylization of the processes of informational and communicative isolation of a person in the digital world. In the context of our research, the image of “Robinsons” is conceptualized as a unique cluster of digital society that preserves the parameters of traditional locality of social life. The characteristic features of the “Robinsons” have been identified: they prefer meaningful language communication, limit their presence in Internet communities as much as possible, do not seek publicity, view privacy preservation as a problem of the new social reality, are sensitive to overload from information noise. It is necessary to single out the “Robinsons” of the generation of Soviet people of the industrial era, who feel the lack of digital skills of the user of social networks or are desperately trying to preserve a way of life based on the projection of the past. The search for universal features was carried out through a critical analysis and an interdisciplinary approach, which made it possible to consider the image of the “Robinsons” through local situations and substantiate the patterns and motives of informational and communicative isolation as general laws. In contrast to a digital person who lives in the symbolic world of virtual reality and wins publicity in social networks, modern “Robinsons” live in a real socio-cultural space. It is noted that they are characterized by the meaningfulness of being, a stable capacity for active and productive activity, a sense of individuality and freedom, the ability to focus on important things and achieving goals, and filling life with meaning. It was possible to illustrate the patterns of human behavior, avoiding the evaluative opposition “good – bad”. Scientific searches for further trends regarding the existence of the cluster of “Robinsons” and their place in the digital society seem promising.
References
Абрахам К. (2020). Фокус. 4 быстрых и простых стратегий для окончательной победы над прокрастинацией / пер. с англ. Киев : Network Twenty One Ukraine. 160 с.
Digital 2023 Global Digital Overview. URL: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report (дата звернення : 22.03.2023).
Горова С. (2017). Особа в інформаційному суспільстві: виклики сьогодення: монографія. Київ : НБУВ. 450 с.
Кірілічева В. (2021). Концепт «бесіда» («беседа») в цифрову епоху: фреймово-дискурсивне моделювання. Молодий вчений. № 3 (91) С. 231–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2021-3-91-49.
Коллинз Р. (2002). Социология философий: Глобальная теория интеллектуального изменения / пер. с англ. Н. Розова и Ю. Вертгейм. Новосибирск : Сибирский Хронограф. 1280 с.
Коляда І. (2022). Самоідентифікація людини в умовах техно-інформаційної реальності. Вісник Дніпровської академії неперервної освіти. «Філософія. Педагогіка». № 1 (2). С. 23–28. DOI https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2022.3.17.
Кремень В., Ільїн В. (2022). Образ світу і людини в парадигмі дигітальної культури: психолінгвістичний аналіз. Psycholinguistics. . № 31 (2). С. 78–94.
Култаєва М. (2020). Homo digitalis, дигітальна культура і дигітальна освіта: філософсько антропологічні і філософсько-освітні розвідки. Філософія освіти. № 1. С. 8–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2020-26-1-1.
Мангейм К. (1998). Проблема поколений. НЛО. № 30. С. 7 – 47.
Онищук О. (2016). Трансформація буттєвих виявів людини в просторі мережевої культури. Humanitarian vision. № 1. С. 91–96. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/hv_2016_2_1_16 (дата звернення: 8.03.2023).
Тоффлер Е. (2000). Третя хвиля / пер. з англ. А. Євса. Київ : Вид. дім «Всесвіт». 480 с.
Шмідт Е., Коен Дж. (2015). Новий цифровий світ / пер. з англ. Г. Лелів. Львів : Літопис. 368 с.