THE ROLE OF EDUCATION IN SHAPING THE PROCESS OF COGNITION: A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2024.2.22Keywords:
philosophy, education, role of education, intellectual development, cognition, philosophical concepts, cultural development, critical thinking.Abstract
The article provides a philosophical analysis of the role of education in shaping the process of cognition. Education is considered as a significant factor in the development and formation of the intellectual, cultural, and social aspects of personality. Various philosophical concepts and approaches to understanding the nature of cognition through the lens of education are explored. The article emphasizes the interconnection between education and cognition, analyzing how education contributes to the formation and development of cognitive abilities and influences one’s capacity for analysis, critical thinking, and understanding of the world around them. The importance of the interaction between education and cognition for shaping the intellectual potential of society is discussed. It is elucidated how education affects changes in society by fostering the development of new ideas, technologies, and cultural paradigms. The research opens perspectives for further reflections and studies in the field of education and cognition. The author underscores the significance of these aspects for deepening the understanding of the essence of education and its impact on the development of individuality and society as a whole. The article highlights the importance of education as a primary factor in shaping and developing cognitive abilities of individuals. The presented philosophical analysis confirms that education not only contributes to the enrichment of knowledge but also influences the formation of critical thinking, analytical skills, and the ability for independent and creative thought. The research also emphasizes the importance of the interaction between education and cognition for the further development of society. Education not only fosters the intellectual growth of individuals but also has immense potential for creating new knowledge and innovations that impact the cultural, social, and economic development of society. The findings of the research can be beneficial for educators, researchers, philosophers, and anyone interested in issues of education, personality development, and cognition. They will contribute to further reflection on the essence of education and its role in the modern world. The conclusions of the research underscore the relevance of further scientific studies in the field of education and cognition. Understanding the interrelationship between these two processes will contribute to the improvement of teaching and upbringing methods, which in turn will aid both personal and social development.
References
Авраменко, У. (2024). Філософія, етика та деонтологія як фундамент профілактики професійного вигоряння в системі інклюзивної освіти. Scientific Collection “InterConf+”, № 41 (185), 136–141.
Гальченко, М. (2023). Генеза наукової освіти в епістемології і філософії. Педагогічні інновації: ідеї, реалії, перспективи, № 1.30, 13–18.
Гончаренко, К. (2023). Місце філософії в освіті: наш формат. Вища освіта України, № 2, 32–37.
Горбунова, Л. (2016). Ключові компетенції у транснаціональному освітньому просторі: визначення та імплементація. Інститут вищої освіти НАПН України, НПУ імені М. Драгоманова, № 2 (19), 97–117.
Ільченко, A. (2020). Філософські засади становлення та розвитку гуманістичної парадигми освіти. Філософські обрії. № 43, 123–133.
Продан, В. (2023). Філософія сучасної освіти: сутність, зміст та спрямованість. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету, Серія ПРАВО. Вип. 77. Ч. 1, 131–135.
Рудомьотов, Р. (2023). Освіта як особлива форма філософської рефлексії. VISNYK OF THE LVIV UNIVERSITY. Філософсько-політологічні студії. Вип. 48, 145–152.
Bekh, V., et al. (2021). Education as a way of human existence in a postmodern society. Postmodern Openings, 12.3, 1–14.
Christensen J. et al. (2020). Human capital and administrative burden: The role of cognitive resources in citizenstate interactions. Public Administration Review, № 80.1, 27–136.
Cox, D., et al. (2022). Theoretical frameworks in social work education: A scoping review. Radical Challenges for Social Work Education, 18–43.
Giang, N. et al. (2021). Exploring the readiness for digital transformation in a higher education institution towards industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, № 11.2, 4–24.
Hashim, M., et al. (2022). Emergent strategy in higher education: postmodern digital and the future? Administrative Sciences, 12.4 (196), 1–24.
Hashim, M., Ashmel, M., Tlemsani, I., Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, № 27.3, 3171–3195.
Kien, G. (2021). Postmodernism trumps all: The world without facts. Qualitative Inquiry, 27 (3–4), 374–380.
Oliveira, K, Souza, R. (2022). Digital transformation towards education 4.0. Informatics in Education, № 21.2, 283–309.
Peters, M., Tesar, M., & Jackson, L. (2020). After postmodernism in educational theory? A collective writing experiment and thought survey. What Comes After Postmodernism in Educational Theory? Routledge, 3–12.
Pokrovskaia, N., et al. (2020). Intellectual analysis for educational path cognitive modeling: digital knowledge for post-modern value creation. Wisdom 1, 14, 69–76.
Roliak, A., et al. (2021). Problem-based learning in pedagogic tertiary education: European context through Denmark environment. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12.3, 71–84.
Searle, R. (2021). Postmodernism and the western rationalist tradition. Campus Wars. Routledge, 28–48.
Shaeffer, S.F. (2019). Inclusive education: A prerequisite for equity and social justice. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1–12.
Zabolotska, O. et al. (2021). Digital competencies of teachers in the transformation of the educational environment. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14 Special Issue, 25–32.
