PHILOSOPHICAL GUIDELINES OF EDUCATION IN THE ERA OF GLOBAL CHALLENGES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Keywords:
globalization, sustainable development, education, humanism, ethics of responsibility, environmental awarenessAbstract
The article provides a philosophical analysis of contemporary education in the context of global challenges of sustainable development. It emphasizes that in the 21st century, education goes beyond its traditional understanding as a social institution, becoming a key space where personal values and meanings, ecological thinking, a culture of peace, and ethics of responsibility are formed. The authors argue that the technocratic model of education, which focuses primarily on productivity and competitiveness, limits the humanistic potential of learning, causes spiritual disorientation, and weakens social solidarity. Thus, the current state of education requires a review of its worldview foundations. The methodological basis of the study is built on a synthesis of philosophical-anthropological, axiological, ecological, and cultural approaches, which allows education to be interpreted as a holistic system within the triad of culture – human – nature. The concepts of well-known scientists are analyzed, highlighting the transition from an instrumental-technocratic to a humanistic-value model of education. Emphasis is placed on the focus of contemporary philosophy on the integration of ecocentrism, humanism, social responsibility, and the principles of planetary thinking. The article reveals the fundamental concepts of the study: ecological thinking, the value- semantic sphere, the culture of peace, and the ethics of responsibility as key features of the modern personality. Such a personality is capable of adapting and acting in conditions of complex social, cultural, and environmental challenges. The risks and contradictions of introducing the philosophy of sustainable development into the educational sphere are examined separately. Among them are such aspects as technological reductionism, the superficial nature of ecological discourse, conflicts between global and local approaches to education, the risk of moralizing, tensions between market demands and value orientations, as well as an insufficient level of interdisciplinary integration. In conclusion, it is noted that modern education should develop as a philosophical space for the formation of a personality that possesses ecological maturity, moral responsibility, and cultural identity. It is precisely this model that can contribute to the formation of a sustainable development consciousness, adequately respond to the challenges of globalization, and preserve human spiritual autonomy in harmony with the triad of culture – human – nature.
References
Freire, P. (1921). Pedagogy of the oppressed. https://surl.li/yudmoa
Holma, K., Huhtala, H. M., Kauppi, V. M., Kekki, M.-K., & Pulkki, J. (2025). Education for sustainable development: philosophical perspectives. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-025-01294-3
Husic, D. W. (2024). Reframing sustainability initiatives in higher education. Sustain Earth Reviews, 7, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-024-00076-9
Konieczny, J. (2022). Global challenges of education for sustainable development. Edukacja Mi˛edzykulturowa, 4, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.15804/em.2022.04.11
Madavarapu, J. B., Kasula, B. Y., Whig, P., & Kautish, S. (2024). AI-Powered Solutions Advancing UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study in Tackling Humanity’s Challenges. Digital Technologies to Implement the UN Sustainable Development Goals. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68427-2_3
Mantula, F., C. Mpofu, A., Y. Mpofu, F., George, N., & Shava, G. (2024). Qualitative Research Approach in Higher Education: Application, Challenges and Opportunities. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences. 5 (1), 1–10. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/eajess/article/view/267012
Mendonça, S., Piovesana, G. F., & Pissolito, V. (2025). Geoethics and Sustainability: Addressing Challenges in Environmental Education for Achieving the SDGs. Sustainability, 17 (2), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020574
Morin, E. (1999). Seven Complex Lessons in Education for the Future. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001177/117740eo.pdf
Вознюк, О., Лещенко, М., Моргун, В., Москалик, Г., Овчарук, О., Піддячий, М., Рибалка, В., Самодрин, А., Тимчук, Л., Шакотько, В., & Шилов, Ю. (2022). Ноосфера Вернадського, сучасна освіта і наука: колективна монографія (Т. 2). Київ – Кременчук: ПП Щербатих О. В.
Левченков, Є. (2025). Філософські засади екоорієнтованої освітньої парадигми в умовах цифровізації та штучного інтелекту: від smart-міста до smart-освіти. Наукове пізнання: методологія та технологія, 1 (55), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.24195/sk1561-1264/2025-1-4
Матусевич, Т. (2024). Філософська парадигма наукової освіти: стратегії і практики розвитку відповідального громадянства [Дис. докт. філос. наук, Український державний університет імені Михайла Драгоманова]. Київ. https://udu.edu.ua/images/data_file/viddil_aspirant/Rady/Matysevych/dis_Matusevych.pdf
Силадій, І. (2020). Розвиток освіти в контексті основних викликів глобалізації. Освітній дискурс: збірник наукових праць, 27 (10), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.27(10)-6
Хунвей Чжан. (2024). Філософія ХХІ сторіччя в контексті глобальних екологічних завдань. Епоха глобалізаіції та глобалізація освіти: філософський погляд. Вісник Національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Серія: Актуальні проблеми розвитку українського суспільства, 2, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.20998/2227-6890.2024.2.11
Яременко, І. (2025). Концепція сталого розвитку як предмет соціально-філософського аналізу. Культурологічний альманах, 2, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2025.2.41
=







