HANS URS VON BALTHASAR AND HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE PATRISTIC RENAISSANCE. PART I: IRENAEUS AND ORIGEN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2024.3.5

Keywords:

theology, Church Fathers, Logos, mystery, tradition, Catholicism

Abstract

The theological work of the Swiss Catholic theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar is mainly studied with a focus on his most significant intellectual vision – a revolutionary theory concerning the priority of theological aesthetics (theoaesthetics), as well as his understanding beauty as a principal transcendental in comparison with goodness and truth. Instead, Balthasar’s patristic books remain largely understudied, despite their crucial role in the early stages of his scholarly research. Moreover, in the context of the Ukrainian academic sphere, there is hardly any reason to talk about a serious analysis of at least one of the components of Balthasar’s legacy. Therefore, this article aims to partially fill this gap, namely, to reveal the main ideas from Balthasar’s early patristic works, which were dedicated to the St. Irenaeus of Lyons and Origen as bearers of unequaled theological mentality and exceptional creativity unique to the early Church. The research contains a detailed author’s consideration of Irenaeus’s anti-Gnostic apology for human history and his defense of the value of empirical reality. The concept of Church tradition Irenaeus formulated, which was opposed to the Gnostic tradition of secret esoteric knowledge, is also considered. In the part of the article that deals with Balthasar’s interpretation of Origen, the author unfolds the meaning of the basic concepts of the Alexandrian master thinker, i.e. mystery which means the ultimate fullness of rationally incomprehensible reality, and Word (Logos) which is the symbolic sacramental self-revelation of this mystery in the material world. Also, the article does not overlook Balthasar's explanation of Origen's teaching about the objective availability of Logos in this world, the perception of which is conditioned by the subjective readiness of a person. The article's conclusions contain the author's reflections on Balthasar's attachment to Greek patristics as a historical example of diversity in unity, and theological pluralism within one tradition without any impoverishment of the wealth of patristic intuitions that could have been caused by their repressive unification.

References

Бальтазар, Г. У. фон. (2020). Слава Господа. Богословская эстетика. Том II: Сферы стилей. Часть 1: Клерикальные стили. М.: ББИ. viii + 380 с.

Гуерьеро, Э. (2009). Ханс Урс фон Бальтазар. М.: Культурный центр «Духовная библиотека». 327 с.

Albus, M. (1976). Geist und Feuer: Ein Gespräch mit Hans Urs von Balthasar. Herder Korrespondenz, 30, 72–82.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (2003). Cosmic Liturgy: The Universe According to Maximus the Confessor. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press. 424 p.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1943). Irenäus, Geduld des Reifens. Die christliche Antwort auf den Gnostischen Mythos des zweiten Jahrhunderts. Übersetzung und Einführung. Basle: Schwabe. 144 s.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1993). My Work: In Retrospect. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press. 120 p.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1938). Origenes, Geist und Feuer. Ein Aufbau aus seinen Schriften. Salzburg, Leipzig: Otto Müller. 570 s.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1984). Origen: Spirit and Fire: A Thematic Anthology of His Writings. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press. xviii + 216 p.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1957). Parole et mystère chez Origène. Paris: Cerf. 146 p.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1939). Patristik, Scholastik, und wir. Theologie der Zeit, 3, 65–109.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1995). Presence and Thought: Essay on the Religious Philosophy of Gregory of Nyssa. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press. 194 p.

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1989). Test Everything; Hold Fast to What is Good: An Interview with Hans Urs von Balthasar. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press. 93 p.

Daley, B. E. (2004). Balthasar’s reading of the Church Fathers. In E. T. Oaks and D. Moss (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hans Urs von Balthasar (pp. 187–206). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Löser, W. (1976). Im Geiste des Origenes. Hans Urs von Balthasar als Interpret der Theologie der Kirchenväter. Frankfurt am Main: Knecht. xiii + 270 s.

Martin, J. N. (2015). Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Critical Appropriation of Russian Religious Thought. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. xii + 310 p.

Mongrain, K. (2002). The Systematic Thought of Hans Urs von Balthasar: An Irenaean Retrieval. New York: Crossroad. ix + 246 p.

Nichols, A. (1998). Catholic Thought Since the Enlightenment: A Survey. Leominster: Gracewing; Pretoria: University of South Africa. ix + 224 p.

Nichols, A. (2007). Divine Fruitfulness: A Guide through Balthasar’s Theology beyond the Trilogy. London: T&T Clark. viii + 364 p.

Oaks, E. T. (1994). Pattern of Redemption: The Theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar. New York: Continuum. xii + 334 p.

O’Hanlon, G. F. (1990). The Immutability of God in the Theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar. New York: Cambridge University Press. xiii + 229 p.

Published

2024-10-24

How to Cite

Shymanovych А. О. (2024). HANS URS VON BALTHASAR AND HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE PATRISTIC RENAISSANCE. PART I: IRENAEUS AND ORIGEN. Культурологічний альманах, (3), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2024.3.5

Issue

Section

RELIGIOUS STUDIES