THE VALUE DIMENSION OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2025.3.21

Keywords:

academic integrity, artificial intelligence, generative language models, digital ethics, critical thinking, educational transformation, assessment

Abstract

This article explores the transformation of academic integrity in the context of the rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the educational sphere. It argues that academic integrity is not merely a set of formal rules but a value-based foundation of university culture that requires rethinking in the digital age. Particular attention is given to the challenges posed by generative language models such as ChatGPT, including the blurring of boundaries between authored and AI-generated content, the issue of ethical responsibility, and phenomena like AIgiarism and AI guilt. The paper analyzes scholarly approaches to integrating AI into the learning process from ethical and pedagogical perspectives. It emphasizes that banning AI entirely is ineffective and highlights the need for responsible use models that foster digital ethics, critical thinking, adaptive assessment, and the formation of personal intellectual positions. The concept of ethics-by-design is explored, advocating for the incorporation of ethical norms during the development of AI technologies and institutional policies. International frameworks – such as UNESCO guidelines and ENAI recommendations – as well as Ukrainian legal and ministerial initiatives, are reviewed to outline the ethical boundaries for AI use in education. The study is based on an interdisciplinary approach combining philosophical, ethical, and pedagogical discourses. It proposes rethinking academic integrity as an ethical competence cultivated through reflective educational practices. AI should not be seen solely as a threat, but rather as a tool to enhance autonomous learning cultures, provided that its use is governed by clear standards and a sense of responsibility. At the same time, ongoing dialogue among all educational stakeholders is essential to ensure trust, openness, and the preservation of humanistic values in the face of technological change.

References

Горчинський, С., Софілканич, М., Горбенко, І. (2023). Якість української освіти й академічна доброчесність: вплив застосування штучного інтелекту. Академічні візії, 20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8022979.

Гришко, В., Киричук, Б. (2024). Академічна доброчесність і штучний інтелект: подолання викликів в освітньо-науковій діяльності України та зарубіжних держав. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Право. Том 2, № 85. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.85.2.45.

Драч, І., Петроє, О., Бородієнко, О., Регейло, І., Базелюк, О., Базелюк, Н., Слободянюк, О. (2023). Використання штучного інтелекту у вищій освіті. Міжнародний науковий журнал «Університети і лідерство», 15, 66–82. https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2023-15-66-82.

Зачосова, Н. (2022). Проблемні аспекти використання штучного інтелекту в освіті: питання академічної доброчесності. https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-345-6-74.

Панухник, О. (2023). Політика академічної та дослідницької доброчесності в умовах революції ШІ: формула взаємодії. Галицький економічний вісник. № 5 (84). С. 185–193. https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu.

Проєкт закону про академічну доброчесність. URL: https://itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/43481.

Рекомендації щодо впровадження технологій штучного інтелекту в діяльність закладів вищої освіти (2025). 56 с. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/news/2025/04/24/shi-v-zakladakh-vyshchoi-osvity-24-04-2025.pdf.

Філіпенко, Л., Думанський, О., Козак, О. (2023). Академічна доброчесність в науковому та освітньому середовищі закладів освіти України: погляд крізь призму наявності штучного інтелекту. Академічні візії, 19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7966703.

Bittle, K., El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Information. Volume 16. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296.

Bobula, M. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education: a comprehensive review of challenges, opportunities, and implications. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education [Preprint], (30). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1137.

Brey, P., Dainow, B. (2023). Ethics by design for artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics. 4 (4), 1265–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00330-4.

Bringsjord, S., Arkoudas, K. (2007). The philosophical foundations of artificial intelligence. Troy, New York: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. URL: https://people.csail.mit.edu/kostas/papers/ai.pdf.

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3.

Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61, 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023. 2190148.

Eaton, S. E. (2023). Academic Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [Keynote presentation]. Open Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association (OTESSA), York University, ON. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/dspace/41407.

Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I., et al. (2023). ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Int J Educ Integr, 19, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4.

Jones, M. (2023). Preserving Academic Integrity In The Age of Artificial Intelligence: Redesigning Courses to Combat AI-Assisted Plagiarism. International Dialogues on Education Journal, 10 (1), 101–123. URL: https://idejournal.org/index.php/ide/article/view/296.

Schleicher, A. (2025). Global Trends and the Future of Education. Seminar. URL: https://ugfacademy.mylearnworlds.com/course/globalni-trendi-ta-maibutnje-osviti.

Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the governance of generative AI in education and research. Paris: UNESCO. URL:

https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research.

Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Authoring Apps. Tesol Journal,14, 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716.

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Kubko В. П. (2025). THE VALUE DIMENSION OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Культурологічний альманах, (3), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.31392/cult.alm.2025.3.21